Reflections on change

After talking to others who attended ALT-C and those who followed the Twitterings it became clear that there was a feeling from those who have been involved in Learning Technology for over the last 5 years that some things haven’t  changed and many discussions covered the same areas that have been discussed at the last few events.  How do we put a fine line under past technologies when they are still being considered by institutions as new? What discussions do we want in their place?

This issue can be demonstrated by a local college that has just implemented a VLE, while others have been running one years.  How do we support both colleges? Do we ignore the late adopters and expect them to read through the experiences of those before them? Where would they find that information and how do they know what is relevant to them? Would the public information be truly representative of what happened? Plus people are often happier to talk about failures face to face than put that information online for all to see.

Lots of questions leap to mind, including: Should there be an embargo at conferences so that they present only on using technologies introduced in the last year, but how would we be able to tell then what a successful implementation looked like? Have institutions themselves taken the “fun” out of learning technology with lack of investment in infrastructure and by blocking tools such as Wikis, Blogs and Twitter? Can we really spend more time talking about what is mainstream technology when the need to change is more important than ever? How can we get back to embracing the new, the wacky, and the exciting?

I believe that a lot of this can be down to culture, the lack of “need” to change, this can be seen at the perspective of a member of staff or a learner (as demonstrated in a recent post) and the lack of investment in infrastructure. What incentive does a lecturer have to use new technologies when rooms don’t have projectors and internet access, and learners can’t connect to the institutions network other than for simple web browsing? How many institutions can truly say that they have developed an infrastructure that allows, and more importantly supports,  teaching using technology choices up to the individual teacher (or learner)? This might be the two main points – supporting teachers and learners and giving responsibility to the individual. Tutors often see the choice of tools as confusing (as demonstrated in recent JISC projects WBL-Way and WBL) and can often blame technology with problems that could be to do with processes or data, which can turn them off from using anything new until it is fully proved in other institutions. I have hope for Enable here, that we can at least address some issues around processes and data, enabling (sorry!) staff and learners to use technology to support their work, giving them time to look at how other, new, technologies can support their teaching/ learning with the assistance of blogs and twitters from colleagues around the world.


3 Responses to “Reflections on change”

  1. Mamevearlense Says:

    Excellent blogpost, great looking blog, added it to my favs!

  2. fleurc Says:

    Nick – thanks for your comments. I would say my personal expectations is to see new and shiny things at conferences, to see innovation on the edge. Perhaps has hit on it and barriers are now too much for institutions.
    I would like to have the answer to be yes its too stretched and lets give it time to catch up but is that realistic? We are, after all, in a international market, can we afford to sit back and say “hey lets wait for everyone to catch up in the UK”? I have to agree that we do need to think more about standards, reliability and security but should that be instead of rather than with new innovation?

  3. Nick Sharratt Says:

    Interesting as it mirrors my own thoughts somewhat – in the sessions I attended things seemed to be either old hat or barely implemented. Even the key note speeches seemed less about exciting new shiny things and more about reconciling and consolidating what we already have and do.

    But is that a bad thing? Well, it is if your reason for attending (and reason you like your job?) is to learn about and play with exciting new things I suppose, but is it bad for the sector? Does it mark that we’ve stretched the elastic band (that is the tension between the bleeding edge and the Luddites) as far as we can without snapping? Perhaps it is right that we need time for the culture and people to catch up with the technology a while and we need to concentrate instead on (boring) things like standards, consistency, reliability and security instead of “hey look at this cool new gimick – which might be useful or useless, but it’s fun!”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: